Last Sunday saw the first Think Inc. conference in Melbourne. Thanks to my awesome manager I was able to score a place in the crowd.
Here’s a few notes on each of the presenters, hastily put together from my jottings on the day. I’m putting this here without much thought or analysis for friends and interested onlookers who missed the day.
Tim set the theme of the conference by talking on forces that create civilisation. He says rather than focussing on the big people of history, that instead we should instead frame the main progenitor as evolution by natural selection. (Incidentally, the Chinese translation of “evolution by natural selection” is words to the effect of “Heavens’ Performance.”)
He laments that evolution has been badly misunderstood over the last 150 years. For instance, “survival of the fittest.” This description is wrong and misrepresentational.
Building has to be “win-win.” Coorperation is necessary for the world we live in.
Civilisation has arisen through different species long before we created ours. Cockroach-like creatures formed complex communities that eventually became what we see today as termites. The ideal civilisation is much like leaf-cutter ants, where (as Plato said) there is “no difference between mine and thine.”
The ants’ civilisation is built on having shared genes. Our civilisations are built on having shared ideas.
Human civilisation seems to have arisen five times independentally around the world, yet they are all very similar, which could be attributed to the hand of evolution by natural selection.
Today, our interconnectedness (through the internet) is eroding the “in” group.
For the next 10 years, Tim’s suggestions were:
o Think of yourself as a citizen of the world.
o Think of global solutions that can be implemented locally.
o Remember that the barriers are falling down.
Wrapping up, he commented on the Fermi paradox – that is, why does there seem to be no evidence for other civilisations in the galaxy? To his mind there were two solutions to the paradox: the creation of the Global Voice is so traumatic that it is killed off at birth. Or that we are the first.
Cristina is a video blogger who analyses questions of society with a rigorous logic and rationalism missing from many modern commentators.
(And dripping with irony, too.)
Cristina posed several reframing of problems and solutions to societal problems, such as gay marriage, legalisation of drugs and the legality of prostitution.
Cristina Rad: “I do want world peace, and which arsehole doesn’t?”
Ayaan Hirsi Ali
Ayaan posed three predictions of the future world of 2021: one optimistic, one muddling through, the final a doom scenario.
She espoused that we need to revive the values of the Enlightenment. We are too laid back with expressing our message, and we need to promote ideas with the same fervour as fundamentalist and extremist religious groups.
Shane is a slam poet from Canada, and after his forty-five minute set I NEEDED his book. I have been rarely moved by poetry the way I was that day.
Later, in the foyer to sign books, he wasn’t able to make it to the official area before a line spontaneously formed in front of him. Conference organisers then brought a table and chair to him.
Neil deGrasse Tyson
…was a brilliant speaker. He was the first for the day to actually use the whole stage, owning the space and drawing us into his world view.
Neil was one of those responsible for reclassifying Pluto as a dwarf planet, which he has received much criticism over, and necessitated this slide:
The thrust of his talk was on the “profound science illiteracy” and the effects of this on society in the United States, highlighted by catastrophic infrastructure failures such as the failing of New Orleans’ levee banks.
Then, paying service to the original conference theme of Atheism, he spent some time looking at the statistic for religious people in the community. He revealed that 7% of “Elite Scientists” are religious, and suggested that if the Atheist evangelists (my term) of the audience were interested in changing people’s minds, then they should start on that 7%, and find out why they are of the opinion that they are.
Tyson was a brilliant presenter, and my hasty summarising of his talk does not do it any justice. YouTube are full of some of his greatest moments. Start with this one:
Michael, founding publisher of Skeptic Magazine, presented a rationalist’s (read: skeptic’s) approach to the world. Essentially the Null hypothesis. That is, if someone presents a hypothesis, you say “That’s nice. Now prove it.”
Question what the mechanism is. Our brains have a fallibility in that we look for patterns, and assume all patterns are real.
He outlined ways of presenting a convincing argument against fuzzy thinking, and was the second speaker for the day to invoke “carrying on the Enlightenment.”
For a first-off conference, I would imagine the organisers were very pleased with the outcome (even though Christopher Hitchens was unable to make his time.) Not only do I look forward to finding out the speakers for next year, but also am interested in the groups that will form before, during and afterwards for some more intellectual debating.
(I can also be heard rambling incoherently in Martin S. Pribble’s Think Inc. Vox Pop Podcast.)